OLDER BLACKS’ EXPERIENCES WITH TRADITIONAL PAPER-AND-PENCIL VERSUS COMPUTERIZED COGNITIVE BATTERIES
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comparison of Computer Testing versus Traditional Paper and Pencil Testing
s International, 48 (7), 2137.Llabre, M. M., Clements, N. E., Fitzhugh, K. B., Lancelotta, G., Mazzagatti, R. D., &Quinones, N. (1987). The effect of computer-administered testing on test anxiety andperformance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 429-433.Lord, F. M. (1977). Some item analysis and test theory for a system of computer-assisted testconstruction for i...
متن کاملComputerized testing augments pencil-and-paper tasks in measuring HIV-associated mild cognitive impairment(*).
BACKGROUND Existing tools for rapid cognitive assessment in HIV-positive individuals with mild cognitive deficits lack sensitivity or do not meet psychometric requirements for tracking changes in cognitive ability over time. METHODS Seventy-five nondemented HIV-positive patients were evaluated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a brief battery of standardized neuropsychological te...
متن کاملComparability of Computerized Adaptive and Paper-Pencil Tests
When a traditional Paper-Pencil Test (PPT) is delivered by computer, two types of computerization can be implemented. One is a linear Computer-Based Test (CBT) in which the paper version of the test is presented and administered via computers. In a linear CBT, the items on both versions are identical, in general, and scoring methods and procedures are the same. The change from PPT to CBT, there...
متن کاملComputerized vs. Paper-Pencil Assessment of Cognitive Change following Acute Ischemic Stroke
IMPORTANCE Cognitive impairment is common among patients with stroke and early recognition can optimize patient care. OBJECTIVE To determine the validity of computerized cognitive testing in an adult population with acute ischemic stroke. DESIGN Validation study comparing computerized vs paper-pencil assessments at two time points three months apart in a stroke unit. MAIN OUTCOME Correlat...
متن کاملA Comparison of Computer Interviewing With Traditional Paper and Pencil Format: Soliciting Sensitive Information
The paper discusses the validity of computer interviewing compared to the paper and pencil one. The results support the hypothesis that computer interviewing is at least as appro priate data gathering technique as classical survey inte/viewing. Especially when soliciting some highly personal information, as in the case of a research on sexual behavior, microcom puters being the "cooler media"...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Innovation in Aging
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2399-5300
DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igy023.2417